“For each of us there’s also a deep internal dimension to this work.
Being an activist is itself a great leap of faith. It can have a long list of personal costs.
But the rewards—spiritual, of the heart, in terms of inner peace—can be incomparable.
If undertaken in good faith, and with success,
the ability to do movement work can be one of life’s great gifts.
Amazing joy can come with saving our only home.”
From the article worth reading- 4 Things We Need to Do to Win the Climate Fight
“Sustainability is now core business for all levels of government –
a necessity, not an option.
National governments are often slow to take up new ideas, so
cities – and mayors – need to show leadership
in sustainability and response to climate change.”
Mayor Max Hipkins
Council Makes Wind/Solar Power Compulsory On New Homes
In a first for Australia, a council has voted to make on-site clean power generation on all new homes and some commercial buildings compulsory. The City of Nedlands in Perth has led the way in turning more of the vast ocean of under-utilised rooftops in Australia’s towns and cities into power generators. For each residential dwelling – a minimum capacity of 1.5kW. For each non – residential development with a value exceeding $1 million – capacity determined by Council with due regard to roof area and height.”
- By far the biggest subsidy given to these major fossil fuel polluters is the one not listed- the horrendous costs of permanently incapacitating land and water to nourish life for generations to come. If we were to not just ask to tone down the pollution but to require that ALL damages be fully and immediately paid for, balance sheets would suddenly show that renewables and extreme efficiency are our only options! If a Martian were here, I am certain that this common sense conclusion would be obvious! Share this video- get politicians to watch it, too. – Editor
“How are people supposed to be healthy…when we keep having companies pollute our water?
They are killing the forest, and the wildlife, and us humans.”
“My children grew up on this land, with the expectation that my grandchildren would be on this land.
Now I can’t do that anymore.
At what point is my garden no longer safe to eat- it’s happening now.
I potentially must pack up everything I own, everything that my essence has become, pack it all up and move it somewhere else. This is very disturbing,
This is my home.”
Teresa Cooper, who’s home and farm have been poisoned by nearby coal ash
From the well-done 10 minute video important to watch- Little Blue: A Broken Promise-
ACTION: TELL YOUR SENATOR TO SUPPORT STRONG FEDERAL STANDARDS THAT WILL PROTECT US FROM TOXIC COAL ASH.
It’s unbelievable. What do most coal plants do once they scrub down their chimneys and collect all the toxic coal ash pollutants that didn’t escape into the air? They dump it into open, unlined and unmonitored pits.
These coal ash dumps can blow toxic dust over our communities and leach heavy metals into our drinking water supplies. That’s why the Environmental Protection Agency is considering regulating the substance as a toxic waste.
For the article
– The movie clearly shows how people are victims of monumental lies. We indeed do have data on health impacts- here is only a portion, but in a sane world it would be enough to end fracking. – Editor
Fracking’s Waste Pit Emissions-The Big Unknown
Here’s what we know about the potential health impacts of airborne chemicals released from fracking’s vast waste pits. As oil and gas drilling spreads across the United States, scant attention has been paid to air emissions from the waste the boom has created. Inside Climate News reporters found that because of a 1988 exemption from federal hazardous-waste laws sought by the oil and gas industry, the waste is classified as non-hazardous. This has left waste pits virtually unregulated and put nearby residents at risk of exposure to chemicals like toluene and benzene, which can cause cancer. Here’s, however, what we do know about the potential health impacts of 4 airborne chemicals released from waste pits.
Open Pits Offer Cheap Disposal for Fracking Sludge, but Health Worries Mount
- Do Americans have basic rights to keep our land, air, and water free of poisons that harm our health, make our water undrinkable, and contaminate our land to the point we cannot drink tap water, safely grow food and pass the land down to our children and grandchildren? If we were revising our Constitution, wouldn’t we guarantee this basic safety as a fundamental right? It is certainly worse than someone coming and burglarizing your home!
Such profound violation of fundamental human rights made me wonder what the Tea Party folks think. While most of their beliefs may be viewed as deeply distorted, there are some concepts that could be applied to this issue. The Left and the Right can join hands when they meet on the other side of the circle. – Editor
TEA PARTY QUOTES
“As citizens, it’s our responsibility to petition our government to do the right thing.
When politicians of any party act against our interests, it’s up to us to call attention to their failures, immediately, loudly and as publicly as possible.”
“Special interests must be eliminated.”
– Mountaintop removal to mine coal is clearly a horrifying violation of human rights and creates permanent destruction of entire eco-systems, let alone creating more climate change. Finally, a brave judge makes a court decision that moves the needle a bit more towards sanity. – Editor
More Bad News For Coal- Mountaintop Removal Nixed By Court
A federal judge ruled that the US Environmental Protection Agency was within its rights to put the kibosh on a permit for the massive Spruce No. 1 Mine mountaintop removal operation planned. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that the agency’s veto of a Clean Water Act permit for Arch Coal’s Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan County was “reasonable, supported by the record, and based on considerations within EPA’s purview.”
The other bad news for coal this week (is) the skyrocketing surge in cases of progressive massive fibrosis, aka black lung, among coal miners in Appalachia.
– Resistance to change by big energy corporations can really slow solutions down. This report provides some valuable ideas that could be very useful. – Editor
Advantage Local – Why Local Energy Ownership Matters
Solar and wind projects can mean big bucks for communities – but only if they keep them local! A new report from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) Advantage Local explains how local ownership allows citizens to have a stake in their own energy production, and “flips the grid” toward a more democratic energy future.
For the new report Advantage Local- Why Local Energy Ownership Matters
– Since the 1990’s Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI)’s Amory Lovins has been explaining the need to create exponential increases in car fuel efficiency, including switching to light- weight materials. He even let this dreamed Hyper-Car’s potentially profitable designs be available for free! Silence for too many precious years. Now we can hope this move- still far too expensive and tiny “concept-car” production- will spread across the entire auto industry. It’s TIME! – Editor
The Hypercar Lives
When VW released the European fuel economy ratings for its new, limited-production XL1 passenger car last summer, you could almost hear the automotive world’s collective jaw drop. The XL1 came in at a staggering efficiency equivalent of more than 230 miles per U.S. gallon of gasoline. The XL1 is named for its engineering goal: develop a production car that can drive 100 kilometers on 1 liter of fuel (235 miles per U.S. gallon). That was the charge in 1999 to VW engineers.
“The bar is high, but the goal isn’t unrealistic.”
Tadashi Mizuishi, consultant at Nomura Research Institute
- All goals we set in today’s world must be as far as imaginable to net-zero energy! Reduction of need for energy is first. 75% reduction in energy use is GREAT- and doable!! – Editor
Japan Pushes Zero-Energy Structures
Solar-panel experiments are part of strategy to replace nuclear power. The latest green building doesn’t just have solar panels on the roof. It has them on three sides, too. Taisei Corp., a Japanese construction firm, says its office here south of Tokyo cuts energy use by 75% compared with a typical office and generates its power entirely through solar panels, pointing the way to a new era of zero-energy structures that generate as much energy as they use. The building, which opened in May, is on track to have net zero energy usage in its first year of operation.
– Destroying what is left of our national heritage- our lands, our water, and our ecosystems- for today’s craze for fossil fuels makes no sense. Really, the call needs to be banning until there are no toxins used or generated, no contribution towards climate change, and equitable distribution of finances. Humm, might take a while.
The real moves need to be to institute every energy efficiency measure possible, every support for renewable energy, and to end every subsidy to fossil fuels, including any exemptions and “blind-eyes” for toxins released. Allowing carnage of land and people by exempting fossil fuels industries from responsibility for health damages and destruction and pollution of people’s homes, crops, land and water is a HUGE subsidy that does not get counted. We changed car manufacturing into airplane production in just 6 months during wartime, so rapid change can happen! – Editor
Senate Dems call for ‘strongest possible’ fracking regs
A group of Senate Democrats called for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on Friday to issue the “strongest possible” safety standards for fracking operations on public lands. “As stewards of these lands and resources for the American people it is therefore critical that the final rule for hydraulic fracturing on public lands offers stringent protections for the safety of workers, our water, air, lands and public health.”
EPA data shows US greenhouse gas emissions rising
The latest data shows US greenhouse gas emissions rising. Emissions from 8,000 large industrial sources in 2013 were up 0.6% on the previous year, driven by an increase in coal use for power generation. After falling 10% between 2005 and 2012, US greenhouse gas emissions have turned in the wrong direction.